Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adnan Istanbouli results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 42.75 hits. Analysis detected 194.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,430 of 28,364 speakers). This Adnan Istanbouli is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Adnan Istanbouli
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos