Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video86.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aditi Hariharan results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 86.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,978 of 28,364 speakers). This Aditi Hariharan is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Aditi Hariharan
Speaker details
Total words: 86.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
32.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos86.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 52.3%52.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Slippery Slope: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos