Author summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos5,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Felicia Mello results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 1,276 hits. Analysis detected 11,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (5,973 of 6,244 authors). This Felicia Mello is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Felicia Mello
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
5%Felicia Mello (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,836
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos