Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adelita Grijalva results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Straw Man, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.4% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 783.944 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,723 of 28,364 speakers). This Adelita Grijalva is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Adelita Grijalva
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠27%Adelita Grijalva (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.9% percentile
17.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos176 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 46.0%46.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 26.6%26.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.6%13.6%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Straw Man: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 26.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos