Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video98.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Wren results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Pessimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 87.3% saturation with 86.032 hits. Analysis detected 204.032 faulty-reasoning hits from 98.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,831 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Wren is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Adam Wren
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 98.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
62.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos98.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 87.3%87.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 87.3%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos