Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Mockler results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 926.9 faulty-reasoning hits from 186 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,245 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Mockler is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Adam Mockler
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 186
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510028.6% percentile
18.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos186 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 47.3%47.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.2%37.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 47.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos