Raw Story⁠93%

Three days in and Trump’s State Fair already ‘falling apart at the seams’: commentator ⁠93%

By Alexander Willis⁠88%

6/27/2026, 12:15:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 88.2% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 1,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 279 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,629 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the article peer group.

Three days into the 16-day Great American State Fair organized by the President Donald Trump-linked group Freedom 250, the event is already “falling apart at the seams,” argued prominent liberal commentator and podcast host Adam Mockler on Saturday. 
“Just like everything else Donald Trump touches, this Great American Fair is falling apart at the seams,” Mockler said in a video published on social media Saturday. 
“We are at day three of his 16-day fair that is funded by our taxpayer dollars to the tune of $80 million, and it’s falling apart.” 
Critics have already noted what they say are small crowd sizes and near-empty exhibits, but several other issues appeared to plague the event within its first few days, including power failures that stalled a Ferris wheel and melted ice cream. 
“The exhibits are entirely empty, the fields have nobody in them. 
Even the main attraction, the Ferris wheel, ran out of power last night and was shut down all evening,” Mockler said. 
“We have melting ice cream, we have not enough tables so kids are being forced to eat on the ground. 
And on top of all of that, even some exhibits have a Confederate flag… I mean, it doesn’t really matter because they’re all empty anyway.” 
The Great American State Fair got off to a rough start weeks before opening to the public last Thursday after performing artists bailed on the event upon learning of its ties to Trump. 
The president would go on to attack the artists for “getting ‘the yips’” and floated himself as a suitable replacement for the musical acts. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.6%Alexander Willis: 6.9%Rawstory: 8.4%Confirmation Bias13.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 26.2%Alexander Willis: 7.3%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic26.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.0%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.6%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 18.2%Rawstory: 13.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion9.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.8%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Alexander Willis: 3.1%Rawstory: 2.9%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 88.2%Alexander Willis: 28.1%Rawstory: 21.6%Negativity Bias88.2%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexander Willis: 2.2%Rawstory: 2.8%Fundamental Attribution Error9.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexander Willis: 2.1%Rawstory: 2.5%In-Group Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.4%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.9%Alexander Willis: 2.6%Rawstory: 1.8%Recency Bias22.9%This article: 14.3%Alexander Willis: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexander Willis: 3.7%Rawstory: 6.3%Ad Hominem9.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 4.3%Rawstory: 4.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 2.6%Rawstory: 3.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.1%Rawstory: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 48.4%Alexander Willis: 8.9%Rawstory: 12.1%Hasty Generalization48.4%This article: 9.0%Alexander Willis: 1.7%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring9.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.1%Rawstory: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.1%Alexander Willis: 10.9%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion16.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 1.3%Rawstory: 1.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 21.1%Alexander Willis: 2.7%Rawstory: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.1%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 9.3%Alexander Willis: 2.2%Rawstory: 1.7%Burden of Proof9.3%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.5%Alexander Willis: 6.7%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal21.5%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.9%Alexander Willis: 2.8%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.9%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexander Willis: 0.5%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy9.7%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 8.1%Rawstory: 5.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.0%Alexander Willis: 5.8%Rawstory: 4.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 23.3%Alexander Willis: 13.1%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice23.3%This article: 9.3%Alexander Willis: 2.0%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination9.3%This article: 22.6%Alexander Willis: 7.0%Rawstory: 8.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias22.6%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.9%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexander Willis: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

279 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker47%attributed speech149writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 27 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAdam Mockler • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Adam Mockler

100%flagged-word coverage
130 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Politically Left Leaning B-6.3 ptsWriter: 25.5%Adam Mockler: 19.2%19.2%Biased Writer Voice-4.7 ptsWriter: 25.5%Adam Mockler: 20.8%20.8%Indoctrination+20.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Adam Mockler: 20.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Adam Mockler: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.