Speaker summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 609.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Mendelsohn results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 269.461 hits . Analysis detected 1,002.896 faulty-reasoning hits from 609.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (26,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Mendelsohn is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Adam Mendelsohn
Speaker details
Total words: 609.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 8.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos609.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 39.1% 39.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst