Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Fox results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 68.3% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 275.324 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,745 of 28,364 speakers). This Adam Fox is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Adam Fox
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠48%Adam Fox (selected)31%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
30.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 68.3%68.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 26.8%26.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 68.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos