Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abdi Dahir Mohamed results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 116 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (12,674 of 26,002 speakers). This Abdi Dahir Mohamed is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Abdi Dahir Mohamed
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 39.7%39.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.7%39.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 39.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos