Speaker summary
ā 79% 1 analyzed article/video 328.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Tobin results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 206.723 hits . Analysis detected 1,304.644 faulty-reasoning hits from 328.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (29,326 of 37,766 speakers). This Aaron Tobin is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Aaron Tobin
Speaker details
Total words: 328.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 14.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos328.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 55.6% 55.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 33.5% 33.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 29.6% 29.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 30.8% 30.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Politically Right Leaningā¦ Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Representativeness Heurisā¦ Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.0% No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.1% Straw Man: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst