Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Pete results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,289 of 28,207 speakers). This Aaron Pete is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Aaron Pete
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
24.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.2%22.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos