Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quillette results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 335 hits . Analysis detected 1,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,652 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,551 of 6,316 authors). This Quillette is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Quillette
Author details
Total words: 2,652
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst