Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Guckian results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Bandwagon, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.4% saturation with 59.25 hits. Analysis detected 268.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,044 of 28,364 speakers). This Aaron Guckian is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Aaron Guckian
Speaker details
Total words: 120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos120 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.4%34.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.4%49.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos