Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Brunskill results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Indoctrination, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 67.8% saturation with 76.635 hits. Analysis detected 376.635 faulty-reasoning hits from 113 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,159 of 28,364 speakers). This Aaron Brunskill is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Aaron Brunskill
Speaker details
Total words: 113
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
43.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos113 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 67.8%67.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 63.4%63.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 67.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 63.4%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 19.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos