Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 68-year-old son-in-law results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 322 faulty-reasoning hits from 103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,420 of 28,364 speakers). This 68-year-old son-in-law is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
68-year-old son-in-law
Speaker details
Total words: 103
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos103 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.3%56.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 29.1%29.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos