Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WBOC TV results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 2,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (232 of 410 publications). This WBOC TV is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
WBOC TV
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%Capital B News1%
⁠1%Spotlight Delaware1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠44%WBOC TV (selected)2%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos