Publication summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Indypendent results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,860 hits . Analysis detected 22,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,205 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (294 of 546 publications). This The Indypendent is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 30,205
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles30.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst