Author summary
44% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amba Guerguerian results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 1,002 hits . Analysis detected 10,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,549 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (6,876 of 8,351 authors). This Amba Guerguerian is better (less manipulative) than 82.30% of the peer group. Amba Guerguerian
Author details
Total words: 17,549
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst