Publication summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lead Stories LLC results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,078 hits. Analysis detected 7,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,232 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (355 of 399 publications). This Lead Stories LLC is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Lead Stories LLC
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%inlander.com1%
12%Lead Stories LLC (selected)2%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 17,232
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate