Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Thompson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Begging the Question , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 239 hits . Analysis detected 1,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,948 of 6,363 authors). This Sarah Thompson is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Sarah Thompson
Author details
Total words: 3,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst