Fact Check: FAKE 'Before Patriot Front' Video Seems To Show Woman From Reuters Photo--But It Was Made With Google AI 7%

By Sarah Thompson0%

7/6/2026, 11:27:32 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Begging the Question, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 823 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (20,545 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the article peer group.

Does a real video show inappropriate "before" behavior by a woman later photographed surrounded by Patriot Front on a Metro train on July 4, 2026? 
No, that's not true: The video captioned, "before Patriot Front" is fake. 
Google's Gemini verification tool determined the video "was edited or generated using Google AI" and there were visual glitches such as a missing reflection that further proved the video was not real. 
The 15-second video appeared in a post published by the X account @ryanasanchez on July 6, 2026 (archived here ). 
The post was captioned: 
The "tough lady" in question: 
This is a screenshot of the video: 
(Image source: Post by @ryanasanchez on X.) 
The first eight seconds of the 15-second video show a woman kneeling and bent forward on the floor pulling down her shorts and then standing up and pulling her shorts back up. 
A semi-transparent black text box obscures an indecipherable social media handle (pictured above). 
A legible caption in white letters reads: 
BEFORE PATRIOT FRONT 
At nine seconds the video cuts to a still image which is a real Reuters press photo taken on July 4, 2026. 
The caption of the photo appearing at reutersconnect.com is: 
A commuter sits as members of the group Patriot Front ride the metro on the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence on the Fourth of July in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. 
REUTERS/Cheney Orr TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY 
Also at nine seconds, the @ryanasanchez video shows a text box overlaid on the still image (pictured below) . 
It reads: 
Lead Stories took the eight-second clip from the first portion of the video and uploaded it to Google Gemini, asking if there was a SynthID watermark. 
The reply (pictured below) said in part: 
The video you shared was edited or generated using Google AI, as indicated by SynthID signals detected in both its visuals and audio. 
(Image source: gemini.google.com.) 
Google's DeepMind watermark called SynthID (archived here ) is detectable by their own verification tools but not visible to the human eye. 
One glitch visible in the video -- typical of AI-generated flaws -- is the reflection in the Metro train window. 
The seats and railings are reflected, but the blue plastic bag on the seat is not reflected (pictured below). 
Sarah Thompson lives with her family and pets on a small farm in Indiana. 
She founded a Facebook page and a blog called "Exploiting the Niche" in 2017 to help others learn about manipulative tactics and avoid scams on social media. 
Since then she has collaborated with journalists in the USA, Canada and Australia and since December 2019 she works as a Social Media Authenticity Analyst at Lead Stories. 
Read more about or contact 
Lead Stories is a fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet. 
Spotted something? 
Let us know! . 
Verified signatory of the IFCN Code of Principles 
Verified EFCSN member 
Founding sponsor of Indicator's Show & Tell Podcast 
Get more fact-checks in your Google Search results by setting up leadstories.com as one of your preferred sources . 
Fact Check: FAKE 'Before Patriot Front' Video Seems To Show Woman From Reuters Photo--But It Was Made With Google AI 
Fact Check: FAKE Screenshot Shows Trump Asking Mullin To Lock Up Communists In ICE Detention Centers -- No Such Truth Social Post 
Fact Check: FAKE Photo Of Mitch McConnell On Life Support Was Generated Using OpenAI 
Fact Check: Mitch McConnell's Wife Elaine Chao Did NOT Go To China After He Was Hospitalized With 'Cardiac Arrest' -- Had Been There For Days 
Fact Check: Mamdani Was NOT Barred From Katz's Deli In New York City -- Claim Originated On Parody Hub 
Fact Check: FAKE Video Of PM Giorgia Meloni Saying She Is A Christian Daughter Of Italy Who Will Not Allow Sharia Law In Her Country 
Fact Check: Chef Jamie Oliver Did NOT Beat McDonald's In Legal Battle Over Processed Beef -- Not Used By McDonald's Since 2011 
Fact Check: UNSOURCED Wikipedia Page Does NOT Prove Egypt-Argentina Match Referee Francois Letexier Grew Up In 'Orthodox Jewish Family' 
Fact Check: Image Does NOT Show FIFA President Infantino Making Phone Call During Egypt-Argentina Match -- He Was At A Different Game 
Fact Check: FAKE France 24 Video Does NOT Accurately Summarize UPA-Related Monument Legislation 
Fact Check: REAL Email In Epstein Files Contains Joke About Mitt Romney's Wife And Barack Obama 
Fact Check: Image Trump Posted as 'Retribution' Against Iran Does NOT Show July 2026 U.S. 
Bombing -- It Is June 2025 Israeli Attack 
Prebunk: London Calling To Stop Falling For Fake UK Protest Videos -- AI Is Leading You Down The River Thames 
Fact Check: Video Does NOT Show FIFA's Infantino Reaction To Egypt Scoring Goal During World Cup In July 2026 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.6%Sarah Thompson: 1.6%Lead Stories LLC: 1.7%Confirmation Bias6.6%This article: 3.2%Sarah Thompson: 0.8%Lead Stories LLC: 0.3%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 4.7%Sarah Thompson: 1.2%Lead Stories LLC: 1.6%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 6.3%Sarah Thompson: 1.6%Lead Stories LLC: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic6.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Sarah Thompson: 1.0%Lead Stories LLC: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 29.0%Sarah Thompson: 7.3%Lead Stories LLC: 3.9%Framing Effect29.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.9%Lead Stories LLC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.6%Lead Stories LLC: 0.6%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 16.0%Sarah Thompson: 4.0%Lead Stories LLC: 4.8%Negativity Bias16.0%This article: 3.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.9%Lead Stories LLC: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Sarah Thompson: 1.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.2%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Sarah Thompson: 1.1%Lead Stories LLC: 1.7%Halo Effect4.3%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.8%Lead Stories LLC: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.8%Sarah Thompson: 5.2%Lead Stories LLC: 6.3%Appeal to Authority20.8%This article: 4.9%Sarah Thompson: 1.2%Lead Stories LLC: 0.2%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 2.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.6%Lead Stories LLC: 0.4%Slippery Slope2.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Sarah Thompson: 1.5%Lead Stories LLC: 1.3%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.4%Sarah Thompson: 3.1%Lead Stories LLC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion12.4%This article: 16.9%Sarah Thompson: 4.2%Lead Stories LLC: 1.0%Begging the Question16.9%This article: 2.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.6%Lead Stories LLC: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.5%Sarah Thompson: 0.4%Lead Stories LLC: 0.2%Burden of Proof1.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Sarah Thompson: 1.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.8%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Sarah Thompson: 2.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Sarah Thompson: 0.7%Lead Stories LLC: 0.5%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 3.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.8%Lead Stories LLC: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 6.3%Sarah Thompson: 1.6%Lead Stories LLC: 0.6%Biased Writer Voice6.3%This article: 2.4%Sarah Thompson: 0.6%Lead Stories LLC: 3.7%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Thompson: 0.0%Lead Stories LLC: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Sarah Thompson: 3.7%Lead Stories LLC: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.6%

823 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers8.4%attributed speech754writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGoogle's Gemini verification tool • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSarah Thompson • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageIFCN • 8 words • 100.0% coverageEFCSN • 3 words • 100.0% coverageIndicator's Show & Tell Podcast • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words33% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Google's Gemini verification tool: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Google's Gemini verification tool: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Google's Gemini verification tool: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Google's Gemini verification tool: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Google's Gemini verification tool: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.