Publication summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Latin Times results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 4,271 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,652 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (188 of 410 publications). This Latin Times is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Latin Times
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%Capital B News1%
⁠1%Spotlight Delaware1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠55%Latin Times (selected)3%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 6,652
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos