Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedro Camacho results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,637 of 6,628 authors). This Pedro Camacho is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Pedro Camacho
Author details
Total words: 2,336
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Middle Ground: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst