Publication summary
15% 32 analyzed articles/videos 18,864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dallas Free Press results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 2,874 hits . Analysis detected 30,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 78,554 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (513 of 570 publications). This Dallas Free Press is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 78,554
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 0.8% BS Score32 analyzed articles78.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst