Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Business Today results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 246 hits. Analysis detected 998 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Business Today is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Business Today
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%Capital B News1%
1%Spotlight Delaware1%
1%The Banner1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Business Today (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 1,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 23.3%23.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.6%2.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Publication 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Publication 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 23.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos