Keyword summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoo Animals results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,737 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (41,472 of 56,146 keywords). This Zoo Animals is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Zoo Animals
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠27%Zoo Animals (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,737
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos