Keyword summary
20% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yellowstone National Park results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,288 hits . Analysis detected 7,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,303 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,980 of 37,530 keywords). This Yellowstone National Park is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Yellowstone National Park
Keyword details
Total words: 12,303
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst