RedState91%

Watch: Bison Hurls Man 8 Feet High in Yellowstone Campground - RedState 19%

By Ward Clark72%

7/11/2026, 1:20:44 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,089 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (17,800 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the article peer group.

Big animals, like bison, bears, and moose, are dangerous. 
It seems every year, we hear reports of some knucklehead trying to get in close for a selfie with a big creature and getting banged up or worse; to a certain degree, those of us with a little more experience around big critters, wild and domestic, feel a certain satisfaction in seeing these aggressively ignorant goofballs learn about this the hard way. 
Sometimes, though, a human gets banged up even when they did nothing wrong, but just because the big critter in question was having a bad day and didn't like the notion of a human being within eyesight. 
That appears to be what happened to a tourist in Yellowstone National Park on Friday, who had been walking past a bull bison from what appeared to be a safe distance when the beast decided to make him a target. 
A man was seriously injured Friday evening after being thrown 8 feet into the air by an angry bull bison in Yellowstone National Park. 
Mike MacLeod, a professional photographer from Bozeman, Montana, said the incident happened at the Bridge Bay Campground, south of Fishing Bridge. 
MacLeod said the man was walking with his grandson when the agitated bison made them the targets of its aggression. 
“I was just trying to get some dramatic footage of that bison having a fit,” he told Cowboy State Daily. 
“It’s changed my idea of what to expect from these guys at this time of year, because I would not have predicted that happening.” 
The National Park Service has not released any information on the incident. 
Now, speaking as a guy with an undergraduate degree in biology with emphasis on behavior and field zoology, I'll venture some speculation here. 
First, the breeding season can make bull bison very aggressive. 
It's a tad early for the breeding season, but only just; the season usually runs from mid-July to late August, but there aren't many hard lines in biology, and a mature bull like this one can start the testosterone jam a little early some years. 
And this bull is fired up; all of his body language states that very plainly. 
His tail is up, his head high, and he's seeking targets for his aggressiveness. 
The humans in the area, the older gentleman in particular, appear to have done nothing imprudent; they weren't too close, they weren't doing anything dumb, but a big bull bison like that can cover a lot of ground very fast when they want to, and that looks like what happened here. 
Read More: Glacier Park Grizzly Drags Hiker 20-30 Feet in Trail Attack 
Yellowstone Tourist Provides Object Lesson: Leave Big Critters Alone 
No, he didn't do anything wrong; nor did the campers who were in the area : 
MacLeod was camping in at the Bridge Bay Campground when his wife pointed out the bull bison entering the area. 
He grabbed his camera and started shooting from a safe distance. 
“He started walking through the campground,” MacLeod said. 
“He was coming up to this group of kids, who were taking pictures on their cellphones from a good distance away, and then the buffalo charged these kids.” 
When the bison charged, the kids safely scattered. 
But the bison wasn’t done yet. 
That's when the older gentleman entered the picture, and for reasons that are known only to that bison, became the target. 
After expending some of its energy on a sapling, the bison tore into the trees and chased the victim and his grandson. 
While the grandson escaped, his grandfather wasn’t so fortunate. 
The bison chased him around the trees while he tried to escape. 
Then, according to MacLeod, the victim got flipped. 
“The bison hooked him with his left horn on his hip and tossed him in the air,” he said. 
“He made a perfect flip and landed on his side. 
The bison was at least 6 feet tall, and (the victim) was several feet above him.” 
The bison did then, after a few moments, leave the area. 
The victim's grandson later indicated that his grandfather had some significant injuries, although no details were forthcoming. 
This is a heck of a reminder: Big animals can be dangerous to humans, who are, in comparison, pretty soft and squishy. 
One doesn't have to deliberately aggravate them; sometimes they are just already aggravated. 
And, of course, our increasingly urbanized population means that more and more people have only limited experience around wildlife of any sort, not to mention a fully grown bull bison that may weigh close to a ton, and which has a temper short enough to limbo dance under a door. 
The name of the beast's target and the extent of his injuries are at present not known. 
Let's hope for the best. 
And if you're vacationing anywhere in the Great Outdoors this summer, where there are big beasts, keep a sharp eye out. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy RedState's conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Breaking: Swift Response From U.S. 
Military After IRGC Strikes Container Ship and Closes Strait of Hormuz 
Russia Closes Key Maritime Routes to Civilian Traffic Due to Ukrainian Drone Offensive Hitting 78 Ships 
Pete Hegseth Halting the Suspension of 8 Apache Pilots Set the Right Tone for an Effective Military 
Iran’s 'Very Specific Plot' to Assassinate Trump Foiled by Warning From Israeli Intelligence 
Susan Collins Is Leaving Nothing to Chance - but Can She Ward Off Another Shutdown Before Midterms? 
Jennifer Oliver O'Connell 
Newsom Lawyers Up As Missing Tax Returns Fuel More Questions About Federal Probe 
Trending on RedState Videos 
NYC Mayor Plays the Fool After State Dept. 
Shut Down Mamdani Official's Meeting With Iranian Ambassador 
DOJ Subpoenas NYT Reporters in Leak Investigation After Air Force One Story, Iran Assassination Plot 
Watch: Medicare Fraudsters Stealing Nearly $200M Through Seniors, Vulnerable Adults in NYC Care Homes 
The Downfall of America's Cities: Why Is NYC Mayor Mamdani Letting Homeless Encampments Fester? 
New Satellite Images Show Possible Iranian Reconstruction of Bombed Nuclear Facilities 
TRENDING ON TOWNHALL MEDIA 
Nick Shirley's Latest Fraud Video Is Another Gold Mine 
FAKE NEWS! 
Ro Khanna Goes Full Greta Thunberg With 'Detention' Stunt on a Trip to the West Bank 
Watch: Bison Hurls Man 8 Feet High in Yellowstone Campground 
Nixon's the One ... 
Again 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Ward Clark: 6.5%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Ward Clark: 4.6%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic9.3%This article: 10.7%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic10.7%This article: 1.4%Ward Clark: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias1.4%This article: 6.8%Ward Clark: 3.1%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias6.8%This article: 5.5%Ward Clark: 8.2%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.2%Ward Clark: 3.0%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias1.2%This article: 1.2%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.2%This article: 21.6%Ward Clark: 9.5%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias21.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Ward Clark: 0.5%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error1.8%This article: 4.7%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias4.7%This article: 5.7%Ward Clark: 5.7%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.9%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.5%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.5%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias0.5%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Ward Clark: 3.9%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem8.9%This article: 1.6%Ward Clark: 2.0%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man1.6%This article: 5.0%Ward Clark: 2.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 6.0%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma6.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 1.2%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning1.2%This article: 9.1%Ward Clark: 10.6%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization9.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.7%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.7%This article: 20.6%Ward Clark: 6.7%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion20.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.8%Ward Clark: 1.8%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%Ward Clark: 1.0%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.6%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division4.6%This article: 9.5%Ward Clark: 2.8%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal9.5%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 32.7%Ward Clark: 1.6%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)32.7%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote5.0%This article: 1.3%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.3%This article: 30.4%Ward Clark: 19.9%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice30.4%This article: 2.8%Ward Clark: 6.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Ward Clark: 12.3%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.2%This article: 4.0%Ward Clark: 2.9%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.0%

1089 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers23%attributed speech839writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 62 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 24 words • 0.0% coverageNational Park Service • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMike MacLeod • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageRedState • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRedState • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

RedState

100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words11% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +98.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%RedState: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.5 ptsWriter: 39.5%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.4 ptsWriter: 6.4%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%RedState: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%RedState: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.