Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Liberty Financial results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,553 hits . Analysis detected 16,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,424 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,688 of 35,654 keywords). This World Liberty Financial is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. World Liberty Financial
Keyword details
Total words: 16,424
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst