Trump filing shows he took in about $1.2 billion from crypto businesses last year 63%

By Associated Press60%

6/30/2026, 10:45:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 2,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 896 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,676 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the article peer group.

By BERNARD CONDON, AP Business Writer 
NEW YORK (AP)  President Donald Trump took in nearly $1.2 billion dollars from his crypto businesses last year, a federal filing released Tuesday shows, locking in profits while his investors were socked with losses. 
Mere startups when he took the oath of office, the new ventures have now eclipsed in revenue much of his vast property portfolio that took him decades to accumulate. 
Fueling their rise were billionaire investors and Trump’s own move to quash a federal crackdown on the industry. 
Trump got more than $500 million from his World Liberty Financial business selling new crypto products, including “governance tokens,” according to the required annual disclosure report with the Office of Government Ethics. 
It also showed another crypto business, CIC Digital LLC, took in more than $600 million from sales of souvenir-type “meme” coins stamped with his face. 
Both the tokens and the coins have plunged in value since the sales. 
Trump also took in millions last year from selling Trump-branded bibles, sneakers and other small items in another unprecedented move for the presidency. 
The sale of Trump-branded watches alone brought in $4.7 million. 
The 927-page disclosure form paints a stark, if incomplete picture of the massive growth of the president’s wealth since taking office last January through a web of business interests  many that have benefited from the policy moves of Trump’s own government. 
Trump has insisted that his sons direct his finances but the arrangement rejects the conflict of interest protections that his recent predecessors in office had instituted. 
Forbes estimates Trump’s net worth at $6 billion, up from $2.3 billion in 2024. 
The Trump business is growing abroad 
The rise of crypto relative to Trump’s property is especially noteworthy because he first rode to office boasting of his property wins. 
It’s also remarkable because that mainstay business also boomed last year. 
Trump took in tens of millions in fees from a flurry of new hotel, resort and condo deals overseas that amounts to the biggest property expansion ever in the century since the family business was founded. 
Many of those countries were negotiating with the U.S. over tariffs, military aid, and other important matters. 
A property in the United Arab Emirates took in $10.4 million. 
One in Saudi Arabia being built by a real estate developer close to the ruling family sent the president’s company $9 million. 
And one in Bucharest, Romania, and another in Qatar sent him $5 million each. 
One of his prominent domestic properties, Mar-a-Lago in Florida, notched big growth last year, too. 
Trump took in in $77 million from the property, a 50% jump from the year earlier when he was just another citizen, as heads of state and business people flocked to it in his new term. 
The disclosure report doesn’t give profit figures, just revenue, so it’s impossible to know how much he is earning. 
Trump is now the billion dollar crypto man 
After taking office last year, Trump reversed the Biden administration’s tough stance on the crypto industry and pushed policies friendly to the industry. 
But regulators still had some concerns. 
Before Trump’s World Liberty began selling “governance tokens,” they issued warnings about this new kind of crypto asset, saying that unlike stocks, the tokens offer no ownership stake in the issuing company, just voting power on certain corporate polices, and are difficult to value. 
Buyers pounced anyway, including a Chinese billionaire who spent $75 million on the tokens and $200 million on the souvenir coins. 
In February last year, a federal lawsuit charging him with duping investors was paused before being settled last month for a $10 million fine. 
The billionaire, Justin Sun, has repeatedly denied his spending on Trump businesses had anything to do with his federal case, while World Liberty has dismissed the notion of a conflict of interest. 
Meanwhile, investors have seen the value of their meme coin holdings drop significantly. 
The price spiked to more than $74 in the days after its launch in January 2025, but now sells for just $1.68. 
Also, the value of the World Liberty tokens has fallen 80% since they first started trading in September. 
The White House says Trump only acts in the public interest 
The White House has repeatedly said that Trump has put his business in a trust managed by his sons, that there are zero conflicts and he only acts in the interest of the country. 
The Trump umbrella company, the Trump Organization, has said its deals overseas were with private companies, not with governments. 
Still, it is difficult to know what is truly private in countries ruled by authoritarians, royal families and one-party governments. 
For a new Trump resort in Vietnam, the report shows Trump took in $5 million last year after the ruling communist party sent its deputy prime minister to sign off on the deal and, according to The New York Times, pushed farmers off the land to make way for the construction. 
Whether the deals played any role in changing U.S. policies in ways these countries sought is nearly impossible to know but the countries did get what they wanted. 
Vietnam got tariff relief. 
Qatar got access to advanced U.S. technology previously off limits and Saudi Arabia got U.S. fighter jets it had coveted for years. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.8%Associated Press: 2.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 3.2%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias3.2%This article: 7.1%Associated Press: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias7.1%This article: 6.0%Associated Press: 7.3%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 3.5%Associated Press: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 32.3%Associated Press: 8.8%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias32.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Associated Press: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 6.5%Associated Press: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.0%Associated Press: 3.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority10.0%This article: 6.7%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Associated Press: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion2.5%This article: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 25.9%Associated Press: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)25.9%This article: 3.6%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque3.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.4%Associated Press: 1.8%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal8.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.0%Associated Press: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Associated Press: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 35.6%Associated Press: 3.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice35.6%This article: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

896 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers10%attributed speech805writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageBERNARD CONDON • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJustin Sun • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWhite House • 34 words • 0.0% coverageTrump Organization • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

White House

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words37% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.6 ptsWriter: 39.6%White House: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-9.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%White House: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%White House: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.