Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cic Digital results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 593 hits . Analysis detected 3,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,665 keywords). This Cic Digital is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Cic Digital
Keyword details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst