Keyword summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windows Update results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,018 hits . Analysis detected 6,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,230 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,756 of 37,536 keywords). This Windows Update is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group. Windows Update
Keyword details
Total words: 7,230
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst