Keyword summary
⁠95%3 analyzed articles/videos1,297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents' Association Dinner results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 1,315 hits. Analysis detected 6,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,891 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (9,500 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Correspondents' Association Dinner is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
White House Correspondents' Association Dinner
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,891
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 33.8%33.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 33.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos