Mediaite70%

Trump Trashes His Own Speechwriters for WHCD Address: ‘Freaking Stupid Speech They Wrote’ 63%

By Kathianne Boniello82%

7/25/2026, 5:03:04 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 601 faulty-reasoning hits from 330 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.6% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,292 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the article peer group.

At least one of President Donald Trump’s jokes at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner actually landed: the one where he trashed his own speech. 
Trump’s more than hour long speech Friday at the Waldorf Astoria in Washington D.C. was previewed by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt as “unifying, but vicious”  but instead, mostly fell flat. 
Even the president realized the night wasn’t going so well when he tried to make a joke about term limits for aging members of Congress and was initially greeted with silence: 
All joking aside, I do think we need term limits in Congress. 
I think term limits are very important because I see what’s happening. 
I see what’s happening. 
The other day, a senator I knew got a text, a great guy, from his wife, and she said, when you get home, I want to have you immediately come up the stairs and make love to me. 
And he said, I can’t do both. 
You know what? 
You know? 
In other words, you can’t go up the stairs and make love. 
Does anybody get that one? 
I thought that was actually pretty good. 
That was actually the only thing I thought was good in this whole freaking stupid speech that they wrote. 
That was the only good one. 
And that went down with not exactly great laughter. 
I think, you know. 
In other words, you can’t go up the stairs and make love too old. 
So we’re looking for term limits. 
Does anybody understand this stuff? 
The annual dinner was originally held in May but was interrupted when a California man, Cole Tomas Allen , allegedly opened fire at the venue. 
He was later charged with attempting to assassinate the president. 
The dinner was then rescheduled and the venue changed from the Washington Hilton to the smaller Waldorf Astoria in Washington D.C., with heightened security measures. 
Watch above via CNN. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.0%Kathianne Boniello: 5.4%Mediaite: 5.0%Confirmation Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Kathianne Boniello: 5.9%Mediaite: 3.8%Availability Heuristic15.2%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 9.4%Kathianne Boniello: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Kathianne Boniello: 11.4%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Kathianne Boniello: 1.0%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.3%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 40.0%Kathianne Boniello: 22.8%Mediaite: 14.7%Negativity Bias40.0%This article: 5.8%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.9%Mediaite: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 4.4%Mediaite: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.6%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 8.1%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.1%Mediaite: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 4.1%Mediaite: 3.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.4%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.4%Mediaite: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.3%Kathianne Boniello: 10.1%Mediaite: 7.6%Hasty Generalization13.3%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.9%Mediaite: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.0%Kathianne Boniello: 9.5%Mediaite: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion3.0%This article: 3.6%Kathianne Boniello: 2.1%Mediaite: 1.6%Begging the Question3.6%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.2%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 1.5%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.9%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 34.5%Kathianne Boniello: 7.3%Mediaite: 3.0%Anecdotal34.5%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.1%Kathianne Boniello: 4.2%Mediaite: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.1%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.1%Mediaite: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.3%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 3.7%Mediaite: 3.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.6%Kathianne Boniello: 10.3%Mediaite: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice13.6%This article: 7.3%Kathianne Boniello: 3.4%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.5%Mediaite: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 2.5%Mediaite: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathianne Boniello: 0.3%Mediaite: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

330 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.