Keyword summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whcd results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 280 hits . Analysis detected 1,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,397 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,030 of 37,536 keywords). This Whcd is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Whcd
Keyword details
Total words: 1,397
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.7% 18.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst