Keyword summary
52% 13 analyzed articles/videos 20,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Well Actually results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 5,790 hits . Analysis detected 57,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 82,103 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (32,371 of 34,040 keywords). This Well Actually is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Well Actually
Keyword details
Total words: 82,103
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score13 analyzed articles82.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst