Keyword summary
28% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,094 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War On Drugs results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 3,627 hits . Analysis detected 27,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,062 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,590 of 37,536 keywords). This War On Drugs is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. War On Drugs
Keyword details
Total words: 36,062
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles36.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst