The U.S. Has Now Killed More Than 200 People in Ongoing Spree of Boat Strikes 10%

By Nick Turse66%

11/17/2025, 6:15:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 987 faulty-reasoning hits from 798 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,050 of 21,175 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the article peer group.

Since September, the Trump administration has conducted an undeclared war in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, killing scores of civilians. 
The Intercept is chronicling all publicly declared U.S. attacks and providing a tracker with information on each strike. 
The administration insists the attacks are permitted because the U.S. is engaged in “non-international armed conflict” with “designated terrorist organizations,” or DTOs. 
President Donald Trump has justified the attacks, in a War Powers report to Congress, under his Article II constitutional authority as commander in chief of the U.S. military and claimed to be acting pursuant to the United States’ inherent right of self-defense as a matter of international law. 
The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel has also produced a classified opinion that provides legal cover for the lethal strikes. 
Experts in the laws of war and members of Congress, from both parties, say the strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings because the military is not permitted to deliberately target civilians  even suspected criminals  who do not pose an imminent threat of violence. 
The summary executions are a significant departure from standard practice in the long-running U.S. war on drugs, in which law enforcement agencies arrested suspected drug smugglers. 
The Pentagon has repeatedly withheld information on the attacks from members of Congress and the American public, despite mounting questions from lawmakers about the legality of these deadly strikes. 
So The Intercept is publishing a strike tracker documenting America’s newest war. 
The locations and casualty figures are drawn from information provided by U.S. 
Southern Command, which oversees military operations in Latin America and the Caribbean, the Office of the Secretary of War, and social media posts by Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegseth. 
Number of Strikes 
Total Killed 
Total Survivors 
62 
205 
6 
May 30, 2026 
Death toll: 3 
Theater: Pacific Ocean 
Target: Unspecified Designated Terrorist Organization 
May 29, 2026 
May 27, 2026 
Death toll: 2 
May 26, 2026 
May 8, 2026 
May 5, 2026 
May 4, 2026 
Theater: Caribbean 
April 26, 2026 
April 24, 2026 
April 19, 2026 
April 15, 2026 
April 14, 2026 
Death toll: 4 
April 13, 2026 
April 11, 2026 
Death toll: 6, from 2 separate strikes, including one survivor now presumed dead. 
March 25, 2026 
March 19, 2026 
Death toll: 2, with one survivor rescued by the U.S. 
Coast Guard and transferred to Costa Rica. 
March 8, 2026 
Death toll: 6 
February 23, 2026 
February 20, 2026 
February 16, 2026 
Death toll: 11 killed in three strikes, 8 of them in the Pacific Ocean, 3 in the Caribbean Sea. 
Theater: 2 strikes in the Pacific, 1 in the Caribbean. 
February 13, 2026 
Theater: Carribean 
February 9, 2026 
Death toll: 2 initially, leaving one survivor. 
The survivor was not found and is presumed to be dead, bringing the total to 3. 
February 5, 2026 
January 23, 2026 
Death toll: 2 initially, leaving one survivor. 
The Coast Guard failed to find the survivor, who is presumed to be dead, bringing the total to 3. 
December 31, 2025 
Death toll: 5 killed in two strikes, 3 aboard one ship and 2 aboard the other 
Theater: Unspecified 
December 30, 2025 
Death toll: 11 killed in three strikes. 
U.S. 
Southern Command initially announced that three people were killed in a strike on one boat, and an unnamed number of survivors evacuated the other two boats. 
The Coast Guard later called off its search for the survivors. 
After questions from The Intercept, SOUTHCOM added eight more to the death toll. 
December 29, 2025 
December 22, 2025 
Death toll: 1 
December 18, 2025 
Death toll: 5 killed in two strikes, death tolls of 3 and 2 
December 17, 2025 
December 15, 2025 
Death toll: 8 killed in three strikes, death tolls of 3, 2, and 3 
December 4, 2025 
November 15, 2025 
November 10, 2025 
Target: “Narcoterrorists” 
November 9, 2025 
Death toll: 6 killed in two strikes, 3 aboard each ship 
Theater: Both in Pacific Ocean 
Target: Unspecified Designated Terrorist Organizations 
November 6, 2025 
November 4, 2025 
November 1, 2025 
October 29, 2025 
October 27, 2025 
Death toll: 14 killed in three separate strikes  with one reported survivor (eight aboard one boat, four on another and three on the last). 
The Mexican Navy failed to find the survivor, who is presumed to be dead, bringing the total to 15. 
October 23 or 24, 2025 
Target: Tren de Aragua (Venezuela) 
October 22, 2025 
October 21, 2025 
October 17, 2025 
Target: Ejército de Liberación Nacional (Colombia) 
October 16, 2025 
Death toll: 2 killed, 2 captured and later repatriated to Colombia and Ecuador. 
October 14, 2025 
October 2, 2025 
September 19, 2025 
September 15, 2025 
Target: “Drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists” 
September 2, 2025 
Death toll: 11 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 5.7%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.8%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Nick Turse: 2.7%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 2.3%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Nick Turse: 6.5%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.3%Nick Turse: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.8%Nick Turse: 17.4%The Intercept: 12.4%Negativity Bias21.8%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Nick Turse: 0.5%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.3%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 2.8%The Intercept: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.7%Nick Turse: 7.9%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority20.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 1.4%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.7%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.9%Nick Turse: 5.7%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization4.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.5%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon1.5%This article: 1.0%Nick Turse: 6.1%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion1.0%This article: 2.6%Nick Turse: 1.3%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question2.6%This article: 5.3%Nick Turse: 2.9%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.4%Nick Turse: 1.0%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof8.4%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Nick Turse: 1.9%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.5%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading5.5%This article: 3.3%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy3.3%This article: 13.0%Nick Turse: 2.8%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote13.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 1.6%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.5%Nick Turse: 12.6%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 1.4%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 5.2%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Turse: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Nick Turse: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

798 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech686writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageThe Intercept • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 48 words • 100.0% coverageJustice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageThe Intercept • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageThe Intercept • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words43% of attributed speech42% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+91.8 ptsWriter: 8.2%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.7 ptsWriter: 15.7%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.