Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Immigration And Customs Enforcement results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,590 hits . Analysis detected 17,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,396 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,531 of 37,536 keywords). This United States Immigration And Customs Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. United States Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Keyword details
Total words: 21,396
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst