Keyword summary
80% 16 analyzed articles/videos 11,021 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transgender Athletes results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 6,333 hits . Analysis detected 61,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,394 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (23,340 of 37,536 keywords). This Transgender Athletes is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Transgender Athletes
Keyword details
Total words: 47,394
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score16 analyzed articles47.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst