Keyword summary
89% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Brady results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,651 hits . Analysis detected 22,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,439 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,108 of 35,883 keywords). This Tom Brady is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Tom Brady
Keyword details
Total words: 19,439
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst