Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Dubow results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Recency Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 841 hits . Analysis detected 5,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,087 of 6,420 authors). This Josh Dubow is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Josh Dubow
Author details
Total words: 3,906
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 21.5% 21.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 21.5%, sitewide 9.1% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.6% Tu Quoque: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst