Keyword summary
98% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Economist results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 2,291 hits . Analysis detected 14,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,086 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,588 of 37,536 keywords). This The Economist is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. The Economist
Keyword details
Total words: 8,086
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst