Keyword summary
54% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Companies results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 853 hits . Analysis detected 8,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,160 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,664 of 37,334 keywords). This Tech Companies is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Tech Companies
Keyword details
Total words: 10,160
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst