Keyword summary
32%9 analyzed articles/videos6,278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tate Brothers results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,401 hits. Analysis detected 16,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,854 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (31,959 of 35,700 keywords). This Tate Brothers is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Tate Brothers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
11%Tate Brothers (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate