Keyword summary
58%4 analyzed articles/videos2,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tanker results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 1,362 hits. Analysis detected 8,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,870 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,371 of 37,536 keywords). This Tanker is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Tanker
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Tanker (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate