Keyword summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,299 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subsidies results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Loss Aversion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 4,204 hits . Analysis detected 29,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,392 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,328 of 37,536 keywords). This Subsidies is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Subsidies
Keyword details
Total words: 28,392
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score12 analyzed articles28.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst