Keyword summary
74%4 analyzed articles/videos2,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategic Petroleum Reserve results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,130 hits. Analysis detected 10,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,912 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,494 of 35,995 keywords). This Strategic Petroleum Reserve is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%Strategic Petroleum Reserve (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,912
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate