Author summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sina Toossi results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 447 hits . Analysis detected 4,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,213 of 6,628 authors). This Sina Toossi is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group. Sina Toossi
Author details
Total words: 3,788
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.5% 11.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst